AHPA, CHPA, CRN, and UNPA say placing ODS under the Office of Nutrition Research would add a layer of bureaucracy. NIH is accepting comments through October 28.
|Articles|September 17, 2014
FTC’s Substantiation Bar: Applied Food Sciences (September 2014)
Author(s)Jennifer Grebow
Searching for trends in recent FTC consent orders and related motions
Advertisement
A hint of a trend: Like the 2010 order for Iovate Health Sciences and weight-management claims, the FTC’s
FTC Requirement: At least two human studies (for weight-loss claims)
Editor-in-Chief
Nutritional Outlook magazine jennifer.grebow@ubm.com
Photo © iStockphoto.com/hidesy
Advertisement
Related to this article
Todd Harrison, co-chair of the FDA practice group at Venable LLP, explains how California’s AB 2779 changes date-labeling requirements for supplements, why stability testing matters, and how companies can navigate evolving state rules while advocating for federal uniformity.
FDA's final NDI guidance sets identity and safety expectations. See what AHPA and CRN say remains unresolved and what it means for suppliers.
The agency’s editorial identifies needs across six areas, including new methods for novel products, gut microbiome data, and AI-supported risk assessment.
The Council for Responsible Nutrition says its Morning Consult survey also found that three in four adults use supplements and that cost is the most commonly cited barrier.
The proposed notification requirement is straightforward, but its legal and commercial consequences are not.
The trade group says the denial does not settle its concerns about a law that limits minors' access to supplements marketed for weight loss or muscle building, and the case now returns to district court.
Advertisement
Advertisement